To which age and sex norms should muscle endurance assessment results be compared?

The choice of established norms for comparing muscle endurance assessment results is grounded in the need for a reference point that accounts for variations in age and sex. Established norms are derived from comprehensive studies and data that reflect the typical performance levels of diverse populations within specific age groups and genders. This allows for a more accurate assessment of an individual's muscle endurance when compared to a relevant demographic.

Using established norms helps to identify whether an individual's performance is below, at, or above average for their respective cohort. This context provides valuable insights into their physical fitness level, assists in setting appropriate fitness goals, and informs any necessary modifications to training programs.

In contrast, industry standards might not encompass the diversity seen in different demographics, and national performance standards may focus on elite performance rather than general population norms. Moreover, recommending no comparison would not provide any meaningful context or benchmarks to evaluate an individual’s progress or fitness level. Thus, established norms present the most reliable and meaningful framework for assessment.